Paired t tests and correlations compared environments overall and by distance between locations. Cross-classified multilevel models estimated associations with BMI. Results Home neighbourhoods had more favourable social environments while workplaces had more favourable SES and physical environments. Workplace and home measures were correlated (0.39-0.70), selleck inhibitor and differences between home and workplaces were larger as distance increased. Associations
between BMI and neighbourhood SES and recreational facilities were stronger for home environment (p smaller than = 0.05) but did not significantly differ for healthy food, safety or social cohesion. Healthy food availability at home and work appeared to act synergistically (interaction p=0.01). Conclusions Consideration of workplace environment may enhance our understanding of how place affects BMI.”
“Context: Previous studies in adults with growth hormone (GH) deficiency have substantiated an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This risk has been attributed to an click here unpropitious lipid profile, increased abdominal mass, and higher incidence of metabolic
syndrome. In these studies, a collateral observation has been a negative correlation between IGF-1 levels and lipid profiles. Longitudinal studies are lacking in children with GH-deficiency wherein the various lipid subfractions after GH treatment were compared to matched GH-sufficient short stature controls. Our study examined changes in small lipid particles following GH treatment. Objective: The primary objective
was to determine the effect of GH treatment on serum lipids in GH-deficient patients vs. short controls. Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective, unblinded, case-controlled, 6-month trial conducted at a tertiary pediatric referral center. Patients were referred for short stature. Incorporating accepted criteria, the treatment group (n=18) was found to be GH-deficient, whereas the control group (n=13) was GH-sufficient. The two groups had near-identical short stature along in addition to baseline measurements of weight and BMI. Epigenetic inhibitor Interventions: The treatment arm received 6 months of recombinant GH at standard doses. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was the comparison of the lipoprotein subclasses and lipids between the two groups after 6 months. Results: With the exception of the intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), there were no significant differences at baseline in serum lipid profiles between the GH-deficient children and the controls. After 6 months of therapy, there were statistically significant differences in Apo-B, LDL, and smaller lipoparticles (LDL-3 and non-HDL) in GH-treated children compared to untreated GH-sufficient short children. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that GH replacement may improve cardiovascular outcome by favorably altering lipid profiles.