There was no

significant difference in sex between the tw

There was no

significant difference in sex between the two groups. The difference in age distribution between hepatitis A-positive and hepatitis A-negative individuals (Table 1) was significant (p < 0.0001). The hepatitis A seronegative group was younger than the positive one. More than 75% of seronegatives and less than 50% of seropositives were younger than 36 years. A total of 426 people came from sub-Saharan Africa, 48 from North Africa, 57 from Far East Asia, 23 from the Near and Middle East, 72 from Central and South America and Mexico, and 20 from Eastern Europe (Table 1). The difference in seroprevalence among continents of origin was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Ninety percent of the people of sub-Saharan

African origin, selleck compound 82.6% of subjects from the Near and Middle East, 81.2% of North Africans, 68.4% of Far East Asians, 56.9% of Latin Americans, PLX3397 and 50% of Eastern Europeans had hepatitis A antibodies. Mean length of stay in a country at risk (available for 589 people) was 22.6 years (range 1–64 years). The difference between the hepatitis A-positive and hepatitis A-negative group in the distribution of duration of residence in a country at risk (Table 1) was significant (p < 0.0001). A longer length of stay was associated with a higher seropositivity rate. Almost three quarters of the positive group (while less than half of the negative group) lived longer than 18 years in a developing country. Multivariate analysis shows that age, length of stay at a country at risk, and the continent of origin predispose to be “naturally” immunized against

hepatitis A (Table 2). Of the 989 individuals to whom serology was recommended, we received only 646 test results. People who did not do the test had several reasons. They did only what was obligatory, did not take recommendations seriously, did not have money or time to Tolmetin do the test. This could represent bias in recruitment. We tested for total or IgG (but not IgM) antibodies against hepatitis A. In theory, acute or recent hepatitis A cases could have been included in the positive group. This would have falsely increased the fraction of “naturally immunized” people. None of the patients had symptoms of acute hepatitis at the time of the interview. Our recommendation of hepatitis A vaccine would not have changed. Multivariate analysis shows that being older, having lived longer in a country of risk, and coming from Africa is associated with an increased probability of being “naturally” immunized against hepatitis A. We found a global seroprevalence of 82.4%. Our study population consisted of immigrants from hepatitis A-endemic countries visiting their country of origin. Seventeen percent of our entire study population and 10, 30, and 44% of people of sub-Saharan African, Far Eastern, and Latin American origin, respectively, had no antibodies against hepatitis A. Many countries with low socioeconomic status are still hyperendemic for hepatitis A.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>