The following factors may affect urinary albumin results.26,42 Urinary tract infection, In addition it is advisable to avoid assessing AER within 24 h of high-level exercise or fever.

An accurate measure of GFR can be undertaken using low molecular Selleck BAY 57-1293 weight markers of kidney function such as inulin, iohexol or technetium (labelled DTPA), however, the methods are time consuming, expensive and generally not available.43 In addition to direct measurement of GFR by isotopic methods there are several methods for estimating GFR. The measurement of 24 h creatinine clearance tends to underestimate hyperfiltration and overestimate low GFR levels and is subject to errors in urine collection unless great care is taken. The regular measurement of serum creatinine

levels is simple to perform and is currently the most common method. However, because creatinine is invariably reabsorbed by the renal tubules, serum creatinine and creatinine TAM Receptor inhibitor clearance measurements tend to underestimate the GFR in the context of hyperfiltration and over estimate the GFR in the context of hypofiltration.44 In addition, for optimal approximation of GFR from serum creatinine measurements allowances need to be made for age, gender, height and weight of the individual. If the variables are taken into account, as in the CG and MDRD equations, a satisfactory index of GFR can be achieved. This is particularly important in thin elderly female

people whose baseline serum creatinine levels may be as low as 40–50 µM. In these people delay in referral until the serum creatinine ZD1839 rises above 110 µM would imply that more than 50% of kidney function had been lost.45 The 6 variable and 4 variable MDRD equations used for the estimation of GFR were developed from general populations (i.e. not specifically people with type 2 diabetes). The 6 variable equation, which is the most commonly used equation for the estimation of GFR, was derived from the MDRD study and includes the variables: creatinine, age, gender, race, serum urea nitrogen and serum albumin as follows:46 eGFR = 170 × serum creatinine (mg/dl) − 0.999 × age (years) − 0.176 × 0.762 (if female) × 1.18 (if male) × serum urea nitrogen (mg/dl) − 0.17 × albumin (g/mL) + 0.318 The 6 variable MDRD equation correlated well with directly measured GFR (R2 = 90.3%). The modified 4 variable MDRD, again developed from general populations and not specific to people with type 2 diabetes is as follows:45 eGFR = 186 × serum creatinine − 1.154 × age − 0.203 ×  1.212 (if black) × 0.742 (if female) The 4 variable MDRD equation also correlated well with directly measured GFR (R2 = 89.2%). By contrast, 24 h creatinine clearance or the CG equation overestimated subnormal GFR levels by 19% and 16%, respectively.