SEM analyses showed that bacterial aggregates were mediated by no

SEM analyses showed that bacterial aggregates were mediated by non-bundle forming, flexible pili that extended up to 2 μm and promoted cell-to-cell contact (Figure 4C). By contrast, EACF 205 was unable to aggregate when combined with EAEC strain 17-2, demonstrating the absence of inter-specific interactions between these strains (Figure 4A). Confirming this fact, SEM analyses https://www.selleckchem.com/Caspase.html did not detect any bacterial appendages in the mixed suspensions of EACF 205 and EAEC 17-2. Figure 4 Settling profile assays. The numbers in parentheses indicate the final optical density of the bacterial suspension after homogenization. A- Settling

profile displayed by EACF 205 and EAEC strains. Bacterial aggregates were formed only when EACF 205 was mixed with traA-positive EAEC strain 340-1 or 205-1. B- Effect of zinc on the settling kinetic developed by EAEC strain 340-1 or 205-1

in the presence of EACF 205. C- SEM micrograph showing non-bundle forming, flexible pili (white arrow) mediating the formation of EACF-EAEC aggregates. Pili extend away from bacteria up to 2 μm, connecting other bacteria. The inter-specific recognition mediated by flexible pili during the mid-log phase indicated the involvement of conjugative pili in the formation of the bacterial aggregates [17, 18]. Endorsing this assumption, EAEC strains 340-1 and 205-1 were shown to harbor traA family genes. In contrast, the EAEC 17-2, which NVP-LDE225 was unable to display inter-specific aggregation with EACF 205, was negative for traA genes. Further evidence was obtained employing zinc, a F-pili specific inhibitor. The zinc treatment of the EAEC strain 340-1 or 205-1 impacted negatively the respective settling curves when performed in the presence of EACF 205 (Figure 4B). Magnesium, another divalent ion which was used in control assays, did not inhibit the bacterial aggregation (data not shown). AAF-positive EAEC strains harboring the traA gene boosted mixed biofilm formation In the search for the presence of potential adherence factors listed in table 1, with the exception of the locus tra, the EAEC strains 17-2 (traA-), 340-1 (traA+) and 205-1 (traA+) shared

the same genotype: pCVD432+AggR+AAF-I+PilS+Pap+. These strains were therefore employed GPX6 to verify the association of the traA gene with the increase in biofilm formation in EACF-EAEC cocultures. Preliminary assays showed that the synergic effect, previously detected using HeLa cells, was reproducible when glass coverslips were used as adhesion substratum (Figure 5A). The increased adhesion occurred in both faces of the coverslips indicating that enhanced biofilms were caused by active processes developed by combination of EACF 205 and traA-positive EAEC strains rather than a mere consequence of bacterial settling (Figure 5B). Mixed biofilms formed by cocultures of EACF 205 and traA-positive EAEC strains (340-1 or 205-1) were 2.

Comments are closed.