More specifically, it was tested whether these findings might be attributed to the social-psychological phenomenon of stereotype threat, as specific gender-stereotypes can affect task performance

as well as brain activation (e.g., Wraga et al., 2007). The behavioral results of this EEG study are not in conformity with previous findings demonstrating that stigmatized groups underperform when the negative stereotype about their group seems relevant and when the situation strikes one as a test of stereotype-relevant qualities (e.g., Good et al., 2008 and Spencer et al., 1999). Under stereotype exposure girls showed no significant decrease in mental rotation performance. Evidence exists, that participants do not necessarily perform poorly although confronted with a negative stereotype that increases the experience of stress, GSK126 supplier heightened vigilance and emotional suppression (Davies et al., 2005 and Schmader et al., 2008). Under stereotype exposure there was an increase of cortical arousal which indicates that girls working under stereotype exposure have an increased Ceritinib nmr stress

arousal. The main aim of this study was to examine whether sex differences in neural efficiency can be attributed to stereotype threat effects. When the mental rotation task was described as a task to produce sex differences (i.e., in the stereotype exposure condition), girls and boys did not show any negative IQ-brain activation relationship. When the task was described as being unaffected by sex (i.e., in the no stereotype

exposure condition) the hypothesized neural efficiency findings occurred only for boys. The later condition represents a replication of findings reported previously by Neubauer et al., 2002 and Neubauer et al., 2005. It hence could be concluded that those findings were not due to stereotype threat. In contrast, eliciting a stereotype Endonuclease threat seems to disrupt the neural efficiency phenomenon, likewise in boys and girls. This finding was somewhat surprising as we had originally hypothesized that sex differences in neural efficiency might only occur in the stereotype threat condition. Girls and boys working in the no-stereotype exposure condition showed equal task performance but nevertheless differed in the correlation between brain activation and intelligence. Only for boys the neural efficiency phenomenon was supported especially at parietal and temporal cortices. These areas, together with frontal brain areas, are assumed to constitute an important network involved in complex information processing (cf. the parieto-frontal integration theory by Jung and Haier (2007)). The finding that sex differences in brain activation do not concur with behavioral results has been reported frequently (e.g., Kober & Neuper, 2011). One reason for this incongruence between behavioral and neurophysiological results might be that sex differences in the cortical activation pattern can be attributed to fixed differences in the cerebral organization in men and women.