Methods: Seventy-three patients with HBeAg-negative ACLF were enrolled. Serum levels of HBsAg, HBV DNA and biochemical items were detected before treatment. Meanwhile the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was calculated based on serum TBiL, INR and Creatinine. The correlation
of HBsAg level with HBV DNA level, biochemical items learn more and MELD score were analyzed. Results: Serum levels of HBsAg, HBV DNA, ALT, AST, TBiL, INR and Creatinine were 5473 ± 3268 COI, 5.29 ± 1.81 lg copies/ mL, 858 ± 930 IU/L, 536 ± 601 IU/L, 450.05 ± 204.95 umol/L, 2.55 ± 0.84 and 69.4 ± 27.1 mmol/L in sequence. And MELD scores were 25.17 ± 4.93. HBsAg level was significant correlation with ALT(r= -0.473, P= 0.041) and AST (r= -0.480, P= 0.038). No significant correlation Selleck EPZ 6438 was found among HBsAg level and HBV DNA, TBiL, INR, Creatinine and MELD score (all P> 0.05). Conclusion: For HBeAg-negative ACLF patient without treatment, the serum level of HBsAg isn’t directly correlation with HBV DNA level. It results from a balance between virus biology and the host’s immune system response lesion. Key Word(s): 1. ACLF; 2. HBsAg level; 3. Correlation; Presenting Author: IOAN SPOREA Additional Authors: ROXANA SIRLI, SIMONA BOTA,
ALEXANDRA DELEANU, ISABEL DAN, ALINA POPESCU, ANA JURCHIS, MELANIA ARDELEAN, NADIA CORNU, MIRELA DANILA Corresponding Author: IOAN SPOREA Affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, Romania Objective: to evaluate the usefulness of Transient Elastography (TE) for the evaluation
of subjects chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Methods: Our study included 604 successive patients chronically infected with this website HBV, evaluated in our Department between June 2007-December 2012 (293 HBV non-replicative carriers, 217 patients with chronic hepatitis B evaluated by liver biopsy – LB, and 94 patients with liver cirrhosis diagnosed by means of biological, clinical, ultrasonographic and/or endoscopic criteria). In each patient we performed liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) by using a FibroScan device (Echosens, Paris, France). Ten valid LSMs were performed in each patient, by using the standard M-probe; a median value was calculated and expressed in kiloPascals (kPa). TE measurements were considered reliable if 10 valid measurements could be acquired with at least 60% success rate and less than 30% interquartile range interval. Results: Reliable LSM measurements were obtained in 84.1% of patients. The mean value of LSMs in HBV carries was 5.8±2.5 kPa (median 5.4). In patients with LB, the mean values of LSMs (kPa) according to the different stages of fibrosis were: F0-1 – 6.2±1.8 (median 6), F2-7.1±1.2 (median 6.8), F3-9.5±3.9 (median 8.8) and F4-18.4±8.8 (median 15.9). The best TE cut-offs for predicting various stages of liver fibrosis were: F≥2 – 7.8 kPa (AUROC=0.663), F≥3 – 8.6 kPa (AUROC=0.771), F=4-13.