Here, we explored the underlying mechanism of reciprocal regulati

Here, we explored the underlying mechanism of reciprocal regulation of these two genes. Northern blot and real-time RT-PCR selleck products analysis demonstrated reduced expression of the primary, precursor and mature miR-122 in c-MYC induced HCCs but not in the benign livers, indicating transcriptional suppression of miR-122 upon Myc overexpression. Indeed, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay showed significantly reduced association of RNA polymerase II and H3K9Ac, markers of active chromatin, with the

miR-122 promoter in tumors relative to the c-Myc uninduced livers, indicating transcriptional repression of miR-122 in c-Myc overexpressing tumors. ChIP assay also demonstrated significant increase in cMyc association with the miR-122 promoter region that harbors several c-Myc binding sites, in tumors compared to the livers. Ectopic expression and knockdown studies showed that c-Myc indeed suppresses expression of primary and mature miR-122 in hepatic cells. Significant increase in miR-122 promoter selleck screening library driven luciferase reporter activity in cells following knockdown of endogenous c-Myc by siRNA and its reversal after deletion of the c-Myc binding sites from the promoter confirmed direct suppression of miR-122 gene

expression by c-Myc. Additionally, among the LEFTs the level of Hnf1 a and Hnf3p that upregulate miR-122 expression, was also downregulated in tumors. Notably, miR-122 also repressed c-Myc gene expression by targeting transcriptional activator E2f1 and coactivator Tfdp2, as evident from ectopic expression and knockdown studies and luciferase reporter assays. Collectively, these results show that c-Myc represses transcription of miR-122 gene by directly associating with its promoter whereas miR-122 indirectly inhibits cMyc transcription by targeting E2f1 and Tfdp2. In

essence, these results suggest a double-negative feedback loop between a tumor suppressor (miR-122) and an oncogene (c-Myc). Disclosures: The following people have nothing to disclose: Bo Wang, Huban Kutay, Shu-hao Hsu, Hemant K. Bid, Mariia Yuneva, Kalpana Ghoshal Background: The liver possesses two distinct mechanisms for healing. Wound healing via hepatic stem cells recapitulates early development (hepatoblast proliferation), while liver regeneration resembles late embryonic growth Selleckchem Erlotinib (hepatocyte proliferation). Loss of control over both of these processes have been proposed as mechanisms that may contribute to poor outcomes in HCC. Methods: We used microarray gene expression profiles to examine the involvement of hepatic stem cell and hepatocyte proliferation markers and regulators in HCV-induced cirrhosis and HCC. We compared 30 cirrhosis and 49 HCC samples to 12 disease-free control livers. Results: Cirrhosis and HCC both expressed markers of proliferating stem cells. Inhibitors of hepatocyte proliferation (HP) were highly expressed in cirrhosis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>