Among the desired features are the ability to validate, suggest selleck chem or delete gene names for an article and higher system recall. The former feature was disallowed due to system security and integrity concerns as a mali cious or novice user might make undesirable modifica tions to the database. Team 78 is working on improving the algorithm to achieve better recall and these changes will be gradually integrated into the system. Team 89, According to the results of the IAT user experiment, the overall performance of Team 89 at IAT was mediocre. This was partly due to the performance of the gene normalization system. The interfaces speed and ability to add and delete genes was appreciated. However, the inability to view the genes highlighted in the article alongside the table of identified genes was seen as a major limitation.

The default ranking of the genes based on a machine learned centrality score often favored genes from well studied species such as humans and mouse, and was often uninformative. A simpler approach of sorting genes by frequency would have been preferred. The comments received from the UAG are being addressed. Team 93, According to the results of the IAT user experiment, the most positive characteristic of the GNSuite system was the clear and intuitive user inter face with nice table layout and context information color coded interactively. Negative comments mostly concerned the bias towards human genes and the high error rate. These problems can both be addressed by ignoring removing the MEDIE input, or by replacing adding new and better GN sub systems as they become available.

The team is working on making module switching straight forward by using stand off notation and common identi fiers. The system was not stable in the beginning of the test phase, but this was fixed prior to the workshop. Team 61, According to the results of the IAT user experiment, of particular interest to end users are the flexible editing of automatically recognized bio entities and the option to select specific species of relevance. Aspects that would improve MyMiner in future develop ments include recording of previous choices of the users through the use of a user task management system or the capacity to add user pro vided customized bio entity dictionaries. The discussion is divided into three sections.

In the first section, we describe Anacetrapib common bottlenecks in the cura tion process culled from the literature and UAG feed back. In the second section, we suggest features that address these bottlenecks. In the third section, we sug gest changes to the overall interactive task based on the experience from BC III. Curation bottlenecks and potential solutions Unassisted and assisted curation by UAG members highlighted a number of curation issues, many of which have been noted in other descriptions of curation work flows.