After 48 h of growth at 37°C under 20% EO2/static conditions, PAO1/pMRP9-1 developed BLS that were confined to the ASM+ and not attached to the surface of the microtiter plate. The https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Nilotinib.html composition of the ASM+ and the bacterial selleck chemicals inoculation are described in Methods. The gelatinous mass containing the BLS was visualized in situ by CLSM. (A) CLSM micrograph selleck products of the PAO1/pMRP9-1 BLS; magnification, 10X; bar, 200.00 nm. (B) 3-D image analysis revealing the architecture of the BLS shown in (A); box, 800.00 pixels (px) W x 600 px H; bar, 100 px. (C) CLSM micrograph of the well bottom after the removal of the gelatinous mass showing no attached bacteria or biofilm (the scattered fluorescence observed is due to autofluorescing debris). Table 1 Effect

of time and environmental variables on PAO1/pMRP9-1 BLS Variable Image stacks (#) a Total biovolume (μm3/μm2) b Mean thickness (μm) c Roughness coefficient d Total surface area × 107(μm2) e Surface to volume ratio (μm2/μm3) f Time (under 20% EO 2 ) 48 h 10 6.52 ± 0.43 11.6 ± 0.28 0.53 ± 0.02 1.65 ± 0.24 1.54 ± 0.10 72 h 10 11.1 ± 0.40 15.5 ± 0.23 0.18 ± 0.02 2.15 ± 0.03 1.01 ± 0.04 6 d 10 18.2 ± 0.32 17.8 ± 0.06 0.02 ± 0.00 0.96 ± 0.12 0.28 ± 0.04 Mucin concentration (3 d under 20%

EO 2 ) 1X 10 11.1 ± 0.40 15.5 ± 0.23 0.18 ± 0.02 2.15 ± 0.03 1.01 ± 0.04 0.5X 10 13.5 ± 0.24 17.0 ± 0.05 0.08 ± 0.00 2.44 ± .045 0.94 ± 0.03 2X 10 15.4 ± 0.35 17.3 ± 0.08 0.06 ± 0.00 1.97 ± .098 0.67 ± 0.05 DNA concentration (3 Glycogen branching enzyme d under 20% EO 2 ) 1X 10 11.1 ± 0.40 15.5 ± 0.23 0.18 ± 0.02 2.15 ± 0.03 1.01 ± 0.04 0.5X 10 2.42 ± 0.54 4.37 ± 1.37 1.33 ± 0.20 0.76 ± .220 1.55 ± 0.15 1.5X 10 2.48 ± 0.22 5.52 ± 0.64 1.07 ± 0.07 0.96 ± .086 2.02 ± 0.01 Oxygen concentration (EO 2 ) g 20% 10 11.1 ± 0.40 15.5 ± 0.23 0.18 ± 0.02 2.15 ± 0.03 1.01 ± 0.04 10% 10 19.4 ± 0.28 17.9 ± 0.04 0.01 ± 0.00 0.46 ± 0.12 0.13 ± 0.03 0% 10 0.28 ± 0.19 0.41 ± 0.27 1.94 ± 0.04 0.07 ± 0.06 1.75 ± 0.30 a Each experiment was done in duplicate. Two 10-image stacks were obtained from random positions within the BLs. A total of 40-image stacks were analyzed were analyzed using the COMSTAT program [20]. Values represent the mean ± SEM. b Estimates the biomass of the BLS. c Measures spatial size of the BLS. d Assessment of the variation in the thickness of the BLS, or BLS heterogeneity. e Total of the area occupied in each image stack. f Estimates the portion of the biofilm exposed to nutrients; biovolume divided by the surface area of the substratum.