Acknowledgments The DDD study

(of which the Ethics study

Acknowledgments The DDD study

(of which the Ethics study presented in this paper is part of) is an independent research commissioned by the selleck chemical Health Innovation Challenge Fund [grant number HICF-1009-003], a parallel funding partnership between the Wellcome Trust and the Department of Health. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Wellcome Trust or the Department of Health. The research team acknowledges the support of the National Institute for Health Research, through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Compliance with ethics guidelines The DDD study has UK Research Ethics Committee approval (11/EE/0313 and 10/H0305/83 granted by the Cambridge South REC and GEN/284/12 granted by the Republic of Ireland REC). All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Conflict of interest Anna Middleton, Eugene Bragin and Michael Parker declare that they LEE011 chemical structure have no conflicts of interest. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. References Ahmed S et al (2012) Attitudes towards prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in British Pakistani parents and relatives of children with recessive conditions in the UK. Prenat Diagn 32(10):954–959PubMedCrossRef CHIR-99021 mouse Baxevanis AD (2012) Searching Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) for information on genetic loci involved in human disease. Curr Protoc Hum Genet Chapter 9: Unit 9 13 11-10 Boglioli B (2011) 50 Facebook stats every marketer should know. Retrieved 29/10/13, from http://​www.​socialtechnology​review.​com/​articles/​50-facebook-stats-every-marketer-should-know

Bragin E et al (2013) DECIPHER: database for the interpretation of phenotype-linked plausibly pathogenic sequence and copy-number variation. Nucleic Acids Res 42(1):D993–D1000 Brenner J, Smith A (2013) 72 % of online adults are social networking site users. Retrieved 29/10/13 Cherkas LF et al (2010) A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing. PLoS One 5(10) Curtin R et al (2000) The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opin Q 64:413–428PubMedCrossRef Donnelly LS et al (2013) Reproductive decision-making in young female carriers of a BRCA mutation. Hum Reprod 28(4):1006–1012PubMedCrossRef Downing NR et al (2013) Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.

Comments are closed.