3A) and LACK-specific intracellular cytokine release (Fig 3B) as

3A) and LACK-specific intracellular cytokine release (Fig. 3B) as published previously 10, 15. As in the case of 16.2β-derived cultures, LACK-specific cells were markedly enriched in frequency (Fig. 3A and B) and total number (Fig. 3C and D) following IL-7-driven cultures. In addition to IL-7, IL-2 supported the significant accumulation of LACK-specific cells as well, when compared with IL-15 or IL-6 (Fig. 3C–F). Again, IL-2+ (not depicted) and IFN-γ+ LACK-specific T cells were mainly found among fast dividing CFSEdim Selleckchem BAY 73-4506 cells

in IL-7- and also IL-2-driven cultures (Fig. 3G), suggesting that cytokine-driven proliferation of tumour-sensitized LACK-specific T cells contributes to their selective in vitro accumulation. Notably, we found that Ag-driven stimulation elicited the expansion of tumour Ag-sensitized LACK-specific CD4+ T cells, but only when provided in minute amounts (Supporting Information Fig. 1), suggesting that currently used expansion methods, heavily relying on efficient Ag-driven stimulation, might not be optimal for the in vitro expansion of recently primed T cells. We next investigated the role of IL-7-driven cell survival. Cell recovery was first analyzed. IL-7, but not IL-2 supported a significant higher recovery of both CD4+ (Fig. 4A), and CD4+ CFSEdim dividing cells (Fig. Ibrutinib 4B) when compared

with control (Nil) cultures in several independent experiments. Furthermore, while up to 72% of CFSEdim cells remained viable in IL-7-driven cultures (as determined by exclusion of TO-PRO-3, a dye which labels dead cells, Fig. 4C), only 40% of proliferating cells were viable in IL-2-driven cultures (Fig. 4C). Finally, while the vast majority (82.5%) of IL-7 cultured CD4+ T cells upregulated Bcl-2 expression with respect to medium-cultured cells (Fig.

4D, left, compare thick line to shaded histograms), suboptimal Bcl-2 levels were found in IL-2 cultured cells (Fig. 4D, right). It is worth noting that IL-7 better than IL-2 Bcl-w preserved CD62Lhigh cells (Fig. 4E), while IL-2 mostly enriched cultures cells of CD44high lymphocytes (Fig. 4F). No significant differences were observed in FOXP3+ T-cell representation (not depicted), or CD25, and CD132 expression (Fig. 4F), while CD127 was specifically down-regulated in response to IL-7 (Fig. 4F), as expected 45. Together, these findings indicate that while both IL-7 and IL-2 sustain the accumulation of in vivo primed T cells, IL-7 best preserves lymphocyte viability in vitro, and in vivo survival (Bcl-2) and LN-homing (CD62L) potential. IL-2 and/or IL-2-expanded CD8+ CTL have been previously used in ACT with various degree of success 1. Having found that IL-7-cultured CD4+ T cells qualitatively differ from those cultured in IL-2, we compared their in vivo potential. First we investigated prophylactic settings. CD4+ T cells were purified from IL-7- or IL-2-driven T-dLN culture and adoptively transferred in syngenic mice (5×105per mouse).

Comments are closed.