1A). Thus, presynaptic terminals of granule see more cells probably express NRX isoforms that could bind to both NL1(−) and LRRTM2. Interestingly, when HA-Cbln1 was applied to HEK293 cells expressing NL1(−),

synaptogenesis was significantly inhibited (Fig. 1A). In contrast, HA-Cbln1 did not affect synaptogenesis observed in HEK293 cells expressing LRRTM2 (Fig. 1A). HA-Cbln1 did not directly bind to HEK293 cells expressing NL1(−) or LRRTM2 (data not shown). LRRTM2 is reported to bind to NRXβ(S4−), which lacks a splice site 4 insert, whereas NL1(−) binds to both NRXβ(S4−) and NRXβ(S4+) (Boucard et al., 2005; Ko et al., 2009). Indeed, presynaptic terminals of cbln1-null granule cells accumulated on HEK293 cells expressing LRRTM2 were preferentially inhibited by NRX1β(S4−)-Fc. In contrast, synaptogenesis induced by NL1(−)cells was preferentially inhibited by NRX1β(S4+)-Fc (Supporting Information Fig. S1). Therefore, we hypothesized that Cbln1 may interact with NRXβ(S4+) expressed at presynaptic sites in granule cells and, thus, specifically interfere with NL1(−)-induced synaptogenesis. To examine this hypothesis, we next expressed GFP-tagged NL1(−) in HEK293 cells and examined whether HA-Cbln1 affected the binding between

NL1(−) and NRX1β(S4+). The extracellular domains of NRX1β isoforms were attached to the Fc fragment of IgG. We confirmed that both NRX1β(S4+)-Fc and NRX1β(S4−)-Fc bound to HEK293 cells expressing Omipalisib nmr NL1(−) (Fig. 1B). Application of HA-Cbln1 to the culture medium Thiamet G specifically and significantly reduced the interaction between NL1(−) and NRX1β(S4+)-Fc (Fig. 1B). These results indicate that Cbln1 interacts with NRX(S4+) and competes with the NL1(−)-NRX(S4+) pathway. To confirm that Cbln1 bound to NRX(S4+), we performed cell-based binding assays, which were previously used for the characterization of interaction between GluD2 and Cbln1 (Matsuda et al., 2010). GluD2 served as a positive control, and GluD2 lacking the NTD (GluD2ΔNTD), to which Cbln1 did not bind,

served as a negative control for the binding assays. At 2 days after transfection, cells were incubated with recombinant HA-Cbln1 for 4 h. Immunoblot analyses (Fig. 2A) showed that HA-Cbln1 bound to HEK293 cells expressing NRX1β(S4+) or GluD2, but not to cells expressing GluD2ΔNTD. Immunocytochemical analyses also showed that HA-Cbln1 bound to HEK293 cells expressing NRX1β(S4+), whereas HA-CS-Cbln1, a trimeric complex that did not possess synaptogenic activities (Matsuda et al., 2010), did not bind (Fig. 2B). Although LRRTMs interact with both NRXα(S4−) and NRXβ(S4−) (Ko et al., 2009; de Wit et al., 2009; Siddiqui et al., 2010), certain NL isoforms bind preferentially to β-isoforms of NRXs. Thus, we examined which isoforms of NRXs interacted with Cbln1 in the cell-based binding assays.