These refuges would only be available to the few species found in multiple habitats, with the rest of the SMS community potentially having a lower recovery potential. Afatinib An example is the ophiuroid fauna at vent sites along the MAR (Stöhr and Segonzac, 2005, Tyler et al., 1995 and Van Dover et al., 2003), where similar species within the same community may have different recovery potential from disturbance, in part due to the possible role of refuge sites. The existence of ranges in recovery potential within the same community makes it difficult to generalise the recovery potential

of vent communities as a whole. Although widespread background fauna are not endemic to inactive SMS deposits, and their populations are potentially not Selleckchem PCI32765 as vulnerable to habitat loss as vent specialists, background fauna tend to have slower growth rates than vent specialists and as a consequence the recovery times from disturbance are expected to be longer (Van Dover, 2011). The recovery

time for background fauna is likely to be on the timescale of years or even decades, with similar megafaunal assemblages at seamounts that have been subjected to trawling showing no signs of recovery over a 5- to 10-yr period following the cessation of disturbance (Williams et al., 2010). If the hypothesised community containing specialist fauna at inactive deposits is found to exist, then this community would be the group most vulnerable to disturbance from mining activity. These fauna are likely to be restricted to specific deposits and will suffer habitat loss without the prospect of inactive deposits being replaced through hydrothermal activity. Until the existence of this community is confirmed, its potential for recovery is impossible to predict. Mining of SMS deposits consists of three stages, prospecting, exploration and exploitation, all of which have associated impacts. Prospecting is the search for SMS deposits, including an estimation of deposit size, distribution, composition and economic value. Exploration follows prospecting and involves the analysis of defined deposits,

the use and testing of mining equipment and facilities and undertaking environmental, technical, economic and commercial studies. The final exploitation phase involves the recovery Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070) for commercial purposes of SMS and the extraction of the minerals contained, including the construction and operation of mining, processing and transportation systems (International Seabed Authority, 2010). To date, no commercial SMS mining activity has occurred anywhere in the world. The lack of a precedent makes it difficult to predict the potential impacts (Gwyther, 2008b). According to the International Seabed Authority (2011b), impacts will also be different at the various mining stages, with exploitation likely to have a high-intensity of direct impact, a local scale of spatial activity (<1 000 m) and an activity duration of years.